Michael Patkin

31 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Michael Patkin
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 12
  • Surgery 128
  • Emergency Medical Services 13
  • Pharmacology 31
  • Biomedical Engineering 82
Replace Juan A. Sánchez‐Margallo with:
Juan A. Sánchez‐Margallo Spain
Frank M. Beck United States
Jack L. Groppel United States
Samuel Rosen United States
Baptiste Sandoz France
Yuliya Yurko United States
Maikutlo Kebaetse Botswana
Tiffany L. Grisbrook Australia
Riccardo Rosati Italy
Marc Kraft Germany
Michael Patkin relative to Juan A. Sánchez‐Margallo Spain Juan A. Sánchez‐Margallo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Juan A. Sánchez‐Margallo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Patkin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Patkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Patkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Patkin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Patkin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Patkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Patkin. The network helps show where Michael Patkin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Michael Patkin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Patkin Line = papers co-authored together Michael Patkin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection.
199573
2 197762
3 200927
4 200327
5 200821
6
A Check-List for Handle Design
20019
7 19799
8 19699
9 19708
10 19678
11 19657
12 19696
13 20045
14 19795
15 19645
16 19705
17 20035
18 19814
19 19653
20
The rural doctor problem.
19683

About Michael Patkin

Michael Patkin is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 33 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anatomy and Medical Technology (8 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), History of Medical Practice (3 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (2 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (12 citations), Surgery (128 citations), Emergency Medical Services (13 citations), Pharmacology (31 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (82 citations). Michael Patkin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amber M. Watt, Guy J. Maddern, Michael Sinnott, Robert J. Black, David E. Freeman, Richard W. Davis, David I. Watson, John Cartmill and Paul Leeder. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Applied Ergonomics, ANZ Journal of Surgery, International Journal of Clinical Practice and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact