Michael Parrish

591 citations
49 papers · 300 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Parrish

24 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers

Michael Parrish
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Political Science and International Relations 143
  • History 61
  • Law 55
  • Sociology and Political Science 117
  • Marketing 22
Replace Bruce H. Mann with:
Bruce H. Mann United States
Jacob E. Cooke United States
Gerard W. Gawalt United States
Frederick G. Kempin United States
Michael Dougan United Kingdom
Harold C. Syrett United States
Keith Ian Polakoff United States
David Ciepley United States
Cathy Matson United States
F. F. Ridley United Kingdom
Michael Parrish relative to Bruce H. Mann United States Bruce H. Mann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Bruce H. Mann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Parrish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Parrish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Parrish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Parrish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Parrish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Parrish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Parrish. The network helps show where Michael Parrish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Parrish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Parrish Line = papers co-authored together Michael Parrish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198757
2 199532
3 197127
4 198819
5 199319
6 199419
7
Latin America and Caribbean contemporary record
198318
8 198915
9 197112
10 198912
11 19979
12 19789
13 19968
14 19777
15 20015
16 19675
17 19864
18 20203
19 19832
20 19832

About Michael Parrish

Michael Parrish is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Law and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 49 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (7 papers), German History and Society (6 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (6 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 papers), European history and politics (4 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (3 papers) and Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (143 citations), History (61 citations), Law (55 citations), Sociology and Political Science (117 citations) and Marketing (22 citations). Michael Parrish has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Omer Bartov, G. Edward White, Robert M. Crunden, John J. Dziak, Thomas C. Cochran, Gary J. Jacobsohn, Phillip J. Cooper, Earl F. Ziemke, Abraham F. Lowenthal and James M. Malloy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, American Journal of Legal History, The Russian Review and American Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact