Michael Naughton

13.3k citations
285 papers · 8.2k · h-index 50

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Naughton

276 papers receiving 8.0k citations

Peers

Michael Naughton
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Condensed Matter Physics 2.1k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.6k
  • Oncology 1.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Cancer Research 411
Replace N. Esser with:
N. Esser Germany
Michael J. Solomon United States
Klaus Müller Germany
Jaap van den Berg United Kingdom
Chao‐Yuan Huang Taiwan
Robert A. Fisher United States
Christian Stock Germany
Toshihiko Yokoyama Japan
T. Kinoshita Japan
M. Steiner United States
Michael Naughton relative to N. Esser Germany N. Esser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
N. Esser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Naughton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Naughton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Naughton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Naughton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Naughton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Naughton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Naughton. The network helps show where Michael Naughton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Naughton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Naughton Line = papers co-authored together Michael Naughton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 285 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010300
2 2006250
3 1997246
4 2009240
5 2005194
6 2006177
7 2008162
8 2015156
9 2015155
10 2004153
11 2010148
12 2001144
13 1998140
14 1983134
15 1988123
16 1985117
17 2006114
18 2006114
19 1988109
20 200798

About Michael Naughton

Michael Naughton is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Oncology, having authored 285 papers that have together received 8.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (72 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (58 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (47 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (20 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (18 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (17 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (14 papers) and Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (2.1k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.6k citations), Oncology (1.2k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations) and Cancer Research (411 citations). Michael Naughton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include P. M. Chaikin, P. M. Chaikin, Ralph V. Chamberlin, J. S. Brooks, I. J. Lee, G. M. Danner, John T. Fourkas, Christopher N. LaFratta, N. P. Ong and Tommaso Baldacchini. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Synthetic Metals and Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact