Michael M. Stephens

4.5k citations
108 papers · 3.4k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Michael M. Stephens

104 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Michael M. Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 1.9k
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology 85
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 329
  • Surgery 949
  • Equine 29
Replace William G. Hamilton with:
William G. Hamilton United States
Sae Hoon Kim South Korea
James A. Nicholas United States
Harri Pihlajamäki Finland
Dylan Morrissey United Kingdom
Keith Rome New Zealand
Vert Mooney United States
Michele Abate Italy
William D. Stanish Canada
Craig R. Denegar United States
Michael M. Stephens relative to William G. Hamilton United States William G. Hamilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.2×
William G. Hamilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael M. Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael M. Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael M. Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael M. Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael M. Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael M. Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael M. Stephens. The network helps show where Michael M. Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael M. Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael M. Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Michael M. Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011280
2 1968197
3 2012162
4 2003135
5 1993122
6 2000108
7 1993101
8 199496
9 199890
10 200482
11 199282
12 199980
13 199879
14 199173
15 199873
16 201872
17 199469
18 199068
19 199462
20 200262

About Michael M. Stephens

Michael M. Stephens is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Foot and Ankle Surgery (42 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (24 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (18 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (15 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (10 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (8 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (7 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.9k citations), Energy Engineering and Power Technology (85 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (329 citations), Surgery (949 citations) and Equine (29 citations). Michael M. Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Perera, Lyndon Mason, Robert Flavin, G. James Sammarco, David Mulcahy, Karen Soffe, John G. Kennedy, Jean H. Dussault, M. G. Walsh and P. Gloor. Their work appears in journals such as Foot & Ankle International, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Foot and Ankle Surgery, Injury and The Foot.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact