Michael L. Hecht

141 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Michael L. Hecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Communication 751
  • Social Psychology 1.6k
  • Applied Psychology 351
  • Literature and Literary Theory 686
  • Clinical Psychology 1.0k
Replace Brant R. Burleson with:
Brant R. Burleson United States
Amado M. Padilla United States
Steve Duck United States
Walid A. Afifi United States
Paula S. Nurius United States
Chris Segrin United States
Valerian J. Derlega United States
Arjan E. R. Bos Netherlands
Daena J. Goldsmith United States
Sheila T. Murphy United States
Michael L. Hecht relative to Brant R. Burleson United States Brant R. Burleson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Brant R. Burleson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Hecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Hecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Hecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Hecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Hecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Hecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Hecht. The network helps show where Michael L. Hecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Hecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Hecht Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Hecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978353
2 1993252
3 2004194
4 2010191
5 2006172
6 2003151
7 2007150
8 1984136
9 1978129
10 2013127
11 2005125
12 2001121
13 2004113
14 2001111
15 1996111
16 2007104
17 200892
18 199988
19 198980
20 197873

About Michael L. Hecht

Michael L. Hecht is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory and Epidemiology, having authored 143 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (23 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (20 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (19 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (15 papers), Community Health and Development (15 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (751 citations), Social Psychology (1.6k citations), Applied Psychology (351 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (686 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations). Michael L. Hecht has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eura Jung, Michelle Miller‐Day, Linda Larkey, Sidney A. Ribeau, Elvira Elek, Flavio F. Marsiglia, Stephen Kulis, Jennifer A. Kam, Brian H. Spitzberg and J. K. Alberts. Their work appears in journals such as Health Communication, Journal of Applied Communication Research, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Prevention Science and Journal of Drug Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact