Michael Khoo

36 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Michael Khoo
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Library and Information Sciences 72
  • Computer Science Applications 36
  • Information Systems 135
  • Conservation 16
  • Information Systems and Management 30
Replace Sudatta Chowdhury with:
Sudatta Chowdhury United Kingdom
Hsin‐Liang Chen United States
Jon Rimmer United Kingdom
George Macgregor United Kingdom
Ingrid Hsieh‐Yee United States
Gregory H. Leazer United States
Maja Žumer Slovenia
Shan-Ju L. Chang Taiwan
Ann O’Brien United Kingdom
Krystyna K. Matusiak United States
Michael Khoo relative to Sudatta Chowdhury United Kingdom Sudatta Chowdhury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sudatta Chowdhury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Khoo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Khoo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Khoo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Khoo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Khoo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Khoo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Khoo. The network helps show where Michael Khoo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Khoo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Khoo Line = papers co-authored together Michael Khoo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201263
2 201542
3 200841
4 200118
5 201217
6 201316
7 200413
8 201012
9 201210
10 20159
11 20059
12 20027
13 20146
14 20165
15 20185
16
Serving K-12 Education with DWEL
20034
17 20074
18
A DDC visual interface for metadata exploration
20152
19 20132
20 20092

About Michael Khoo

Michael Khoo is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Library and Information Sciences, Communication and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 37 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (7 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (6 papers), Library Science and Administration (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (5 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (4 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (4 papers), E-Government and Public Services (4 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (72 citations), Computer Science Applications (36 citations), Information Systems (135 citations), Conservation (16 citations) and Information Systems and Management (30 citations). Michael Khoo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Hall, Mimi Recker, Craig M. MacDonald, R. A. Donahue, Tamara Sumner, Gary Rosenberg, Xia Lin, Douglas Tudhope, Ceri Binding and Jae‐wook Ahn. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Journal of Documentation, D-Lib Magazine, American Malacological Bulletin and Information and Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact