Michael K. Burrow

680 citations
12 papers · 573 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael K. Burrow

11 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Michael K. Burrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Ophthalmology 207
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 369
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 151
  • Genetics 33
  • Rehabilitation 16
Replace Rebekah Poh with:
Rebekah Poh Singapore
Sayena Jabbehdari United States
Augusto Pocobelli Italy
Yoshinori Oie Japan
Carla S. Medeiros Brazil
Rodrigo Carlos de Oliveira United States
Romina Fasciani Italy
Shangkun Ou China
Xin-Yi Seah Singapore
Bogumił Wowra Poland
Michael K. Burrow relative to Rebekah Poh Singapore Rebekah Poh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Rebekah Poh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael K. Burrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael K. Burrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael K. Burrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael K. Burrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael K. Burrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael K. Burrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael K. Burrow. The network helps show where Michael K. Burrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael K. Burrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael K. Burrow Line = papers co-authored together Michael K. Burrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2014228
2 2011100
3 201255
4 201151
5 201142
6 201125
7 201018
8 201216
9 201115
10 201013
11 201010
12 20110

About Michael K. Burrow

Michael K. Burrow is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 12 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (8 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (1 paper) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (207 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (369 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (151 citations), Genetics (33 citations) and Rehabilitation (16 citations). Michael K. Burrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and India. Frequent co-authors include Don K. Davis, Liliana Pacini Werner, Kira L. Lathrop, James L. Funderburgh, Yiqin Du, Mary M. Mann, Fatima N. Syed-Picard, Sayan Basu, Sheila M. Adams and Martha L. Funderburgh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Science Translational Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact