Michael John

67 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael John
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Rehabilitation 151
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 35
  • Physiology 396
  • Biochemistry 117
  • Biophysics 93
Replace Quan Wei with:
Quan Wei China
Makoto Noguchi Japan
Eiji Suzuki Japan
Laura Gilliam United States
Zhongcheng Xin China
İhsan Solaroğlu Türkiye
David M. Parker United States
Rainer Klocke Germany
Imre Pávó Hungary
Michael John relative to Quan Wei China Quan Wei's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.5×
Quan Wei · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael John

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael John more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael John

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael John. The network helps show where Michael John may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael John Line = papers co-authored together Michael John links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992475
2 199697
3 200690
4 201967
5
The patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE): cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties.
200960
6 200558
7 201157
8 200550
9 201747
10 200945
11 200341
12 201941
13 199537
14 200336
15
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients.
200731
16 200730
17 200230
18 199024
19 200423
20 201021

About Michael John

Michael John is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment (8 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (7 papers), European history and politics (6 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (151 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (35 citations), Physiology (396 citations), Biochemistry (117 citations) and Biophysics (93 citations). Michael John has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Mayer, Peter Klatt, Eycke Böhme, Beat R. Simmen, Felix Angst, Hans‐Kaspar Schwyzer, Matthias Flury, Jörg Goldhahn, Anand Asundi and Bertram Wiedenmann. Their work appears in journals such as Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, International Orthopaedics and European Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact