Michael Harned

1.7k citations
22 papers · 483 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Harned

19 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

Michael Harned
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 154
  • Virology 47
  • Biological Psychiatry 17
  • Neurology 48
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 90
Replace Tom Webb with:
Tom Webb United Kingdom
Oleg Kambur Finland
Lulin Ma China
Beom Shim United States
Kazuna Sugiyama Japan
Maxim Eckmann United States
Irina Raicher Brazil
Robert Schedel Germany
M Umino Japan
Hideki Iwata Japan
Michael Harned relative to Tom Webb United Kingdom Tom Webb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Tom Webb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Harned

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Harned's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Harned with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Harned more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Harned

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Harned. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Harned. The network helps show where Michael Harned may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Harned, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Harned Line = papers co-authored together Michael Harned links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review.
2016113
2 200387
3 201144
4 201639
5 200634
6 201726
7 201125
8 201525
9 200220
10 201519
11 201913
12 20108
13 20138
14
Novel use of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion for sedation during spinal cord stimulator lead placement via surgical laminectomy.
20106
15 20115
16 20074
17 20113
18 20251
19 20111
20 20221

About Michael Harned

Michael Harned is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Physiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Treatment (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (154 citations), Virology (47 citations), Biological Psychiatry (17 citations), Neurology (48 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (90 citations). Michael Harned has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wayne A. Cass, Paul A. Sloan, Jay S. Grider, Laura E. Peters, William F. Maragos, Avindra Nath, Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Paul J. Christo, Manohar Sharma and Kim B. Seroogy. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, Pain Physician, Brain Research, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety and Journal of Pain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact