Michael G. Booth
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 9
-
- Lichen and fungal ecology 6
- Plant and animal studies 1
- Co-authors
- Jason D. Hoeksema (2 shared papers)D. Lee Taylor (6 shared papers)Ian Herriott (4 shared papers)Niall J. Lennon (5 shared papers)Jack W. McFarland (3 shared papers)Chad Nusbaum (4 shared papers)Gary A. Laursen (3 shared papers)Elizabeth L. Kalies (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Molecular Ecology Resources (2 papers)Ecosystems (1 paper)Molecular Ecology (1 paper)Ecology Letters (1 paper)New Phytologist (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Michael G. Booth
10 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Insect Science 174
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 134
- Plant Science 342
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 162
- Cell Biology 122
Countries citing papers authored by Michael G. Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael G. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael G. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael G. Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael G. Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael G. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael G. Booth. The network helps show where Michael G. Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Michael G. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 75 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 9 | Molecular phylogenetic biodiversity assessment of arctic and boreal ectomycorrhizal Lactarius Pers. (Russulales; Basidiomycota) in Alaska, based on soil and sporocarp DNA | 2009 | 12 |
| 10 | 2008 | 1 |
About Michael G. Booth
Michael G. Booth is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Cell Biology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (9 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (6 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper), Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (174 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (134 citations), Plant Science (342 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (162 citations) and Cell Biology (122 citations). Michael G. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jason D. Hoeksema, D. Lee Taylor, Ian Herriott, Niall J. Lennon, Jack W. McFarland, Chad Nusbaum, Gary A. Laursen, Elizabeth L. Kalies, József Geml and Mary Beth Leigh. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Ecology Resources, Ecosystems, Molecular Ecology, Ecology Letters and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.