Michael Förtsch

790 citations
24 papers · 572 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Förtsch

22 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers

Michael Förtsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 458
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 10
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 336
  • Artificial Intelligence 197
  • Instrumentation 16
Replace Stephen C. Wein with:
Stephen C. Wein France
Tedros Tsegaye Sweden
Xiang You China
Kien Phan Huy France
Jörn P. Epping Netherlands
Hideyuki Sotobayashi Japan
E. Goobar Sweden
Hayden McGuinness United States
Jueming Bao China
Mauro Valeri Italy
Michael Förtsch relative to Stephen C. Wein France Stephen C. Wein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Stephen C. Wein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Förtsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Förtsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Förtsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Förtsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Förtsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Förtsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Förtsch. The network helps show where Michael Förtsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Förtsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Förtsch Line = papers co-authored together Michael Förtsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013179
2 2011105
3 201456
4 201346
5 201534
6 201534
7 201030
8 200617
9 200316
10 201511
11 20057
12 20137
13 20047
14 20035
15 20044
16 20054
17 20033
18 20042
19 20031
20 20101

About Michael Förtsch

Michael Förtsch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bioengineering, Instrumentation and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 24 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (14 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (7 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (6 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (5 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers), Optical Network Technologies (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers) and Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (458 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (10 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (336 citations), Artificial Intelligence (197 citations) and Instrumentation (16 citations). Michael Förtsch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gerd Leuchs, Christoph W. Marquardt, Dmitry Strekalov, Josef Urban Fürst, Andrea Aiello, Christoffer Wittmann, Christine Silberhorn, Horst Zimmermann, Maria V. Chekhova and Florian Sedlmeir. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Electronics Letters, Journal of Optics, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics and Advanced Quantum Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact