Michael Feeney
Impact in
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
-
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Papers in
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 4
-
- CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors 4
- Co-authors
- R. Walters (2 shared papers)Jan van Roestel (2 shared papers)Kevin B. Burdge (2 shared papers)A. Dugas (2 shared papers)Roger M. Smith (4 shared papers)Dmitry A. Duev (2 shared papers)C. Fremling (2 shared papers)S. R. Kulkarni (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Engineering Optimization (1 paper)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1 paper)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters (1 paper)Powder Diffraction (1 paper)Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Michael Feeney
9 papers receiving 59 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Instrumentation 13
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 42
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 10
- Radiation 3
- Computational Mechanics 6
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Feeney
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Feeney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Feeney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Feeney. The network helps show where Michael Feeney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Feeney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 8 | STRATEGY OF FUSION BEAD CORRECTION IN XRF ANALYSIS OF POWDERS | 2012 | 1 |
| 9 | 2017 | 1 |
About Michael Feeney
Michael Feeney is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 62 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (4 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (2 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (1 paper), Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics (1 paper), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (1 paper) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (13 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (42 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (10 citations), Radiation (3 citations) and Computational Mechanics (6 citations). Michael Feeney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include R. Walters, Jan van Roestel, Kevin B. Burdge, A. Dugas, Roger M. Smith, Dmitry A. Duev, C. Fremling, S. R. Kulkarni, Richard Dekany and Thomas A. Prince. Their work appears in journals such as Engineering Optimization, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters, Powder Diffraction and Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.