Michael Fairhurst

1.6k citations
82 papers · 856 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Fairhurst

79 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Michael Fairhurst
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 479
  • Signal Processing 248
  • Human-Computer Interaction 56
  • Media Technology 79
  • Information Systems 151
Replace Xingang Liu with:
Xingang Liu China
Jun Ogata Japan
Aggelos Pikrakis Greece
Raymond Ptucha United States
Zhi Xu China
Anoop Namboodiri India
Daw-Tung Lin Taiwan
Avinash G. Keskar India
Ahmet Sertbaş Türkiye
Lin Feng China
Michael Fairhurst relative to Xingang Liu China Xingang Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Xingang Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Fairhurst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Fairhurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Fairhurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Fairhurst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Fairhurst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Fairhurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Fairhurst. The network helps show where Michael Fairhurst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Fairhurst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Fairhurst Line = papers co-authored together Michael Fairhurst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006190
2 201546
3 199244
4
Computer vision for robotic systems: an introduction
198837
5 200736
6 201935
7 201524
8 200023
9 201322
10 201018
11 200818
12 201415
13 200714
14 201414
15 201213
16 199713
17 201712
18 200412
19 200912
20 200712

About Michael Fairhurst

Michael Fairhurst is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 82 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (23 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (22 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (20 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (9 papers), Face recognition and analysis (9 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (8 papers), Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (7 papers) and Face and Expression Recognition (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (479 citations), Signal Processing (248 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (56 citations), Media Technology (79 citations) and Information Systems (151 citations). Michael Fairhurst has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Li Bai, Linlin Shen, Márjory Da Costa‐Abreu, Gareth Howells, Richard Guest, Thomas Tannert, Weiguo Sheng, Xiaoyue Zhang, Anne M. P. Canuto and Farzin Deravi. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Neural Systems, Pattern Analysis and Applications, Connection Science, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems and Knowledge-Based Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact