Michael E. Schwartz

13 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

Michael E. Schwartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Waste Management and Disposal 59
  • Aquatic Science 41
  • Epidemiology 117
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Emergency Medicine 28
Replace Charles E. Faupel with:
Charles E. Faupel United States
Hannah Ruth Barker United Kingdom
Marian I. Tulloch Australia
George D. Lowe United States
Xiaopeng Pang China
Keith A. Miller United States
Rajinder Sonia Singh United States
Andy Bell United Kingdom
Helen Murphy United Kingdom
Brian R. Wyant United States
Michael E. Schwartz relative to Charles E. Faupel United States Charles E. Faupel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.4×
Charles E. Faupel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Schwartz. The network helps show where Michael E. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Schwartz Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Schwartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200585
2 196383
3 199582
4 196682
5 196543
6 200432
7 200428
8 199522
9 200720
10 197614
11 20182
12
Docker for Developers: Develop and run your application with Docker containers using DevOps tools for continuous delivery
20201
13
Securing the Perimeter: Deploying Identity and Access Management with Free Open Source Software
20181
14 19641

About Michael E. Schwartz

Michael E. Schwartz is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Information Systems, Aquatic Science, Safety Research and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 14 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (1 paper), Political Conflict and Governance (1 paper) and Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Waste Management and Disposal (59 citations), Aquatic Science (41 citations), Epidemiology (117 citations), Applied Psychology (17 citations) and Emergency Medicine (28 citations). Michael E. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Claude E. Boyd, Joseph R. Gusfield, Carl W. Backman, Paul F. Secord, Sandra Schwartz Tangri, Joshua B. Cantor, Teresa A. Ashman, Wayne A. Gordon, Mary R. Hibbard and Lisa A. Spielman. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Social Problems, Administrative Science Quarterly, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and American Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact