Michael E. Irwin

2.5k citations
107 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Michael E. Irwin

99 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Michael E. Irwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Insect Science 1.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 786
  • Plant Science 1.2k
  • Horticulture 27
  • Ecological Modeling 103
Replace Jonas Sandström with:
Jonas Sandström Sweden
Paul A. Umina Australia
Robert G. Foottit Canada
Mark G. Wright United States
Sylvie Augustin France
George C. Hamilton United States
Anna Skoracka Poland
Nathan P. Havill United States
C.B. Phillips New Zealand
Tania Yonow Australia
Michael E. Irwin relative to Jonas Sandström Sweden Jonas Sandström's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jonas Sandström · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Irwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Irwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Irwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Irwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Irwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Irwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Irwin. The network helps show where Michael E. Irwin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Irwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael E. Irwin Line = papers co-authored together Michael E. Irwin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990167
2 2008116
3 1988111
4 199987
5 198186
6 200782
7
Soybean mosaic virus.
198169
8
Vector intensity: a product of propensity and activity
198666
9 199561
10 198051
11 199948
12 198144
13 198042
14 200042
15 198839
16 197938
17 200036
18 199235
19 200033
20 198530

About Michael E. Irwin

Michael E. Irwin is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Genetics and Ecology, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (43 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (30 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (23 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (21 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (16 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (14 papers) and Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (786 citations), Plant Science (1.2k citations), Horticulture (27 citations) and Ecological Modeling (103 citations). Michael E. Irwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Thresh, Gail E. Kampmeier, David K. Yeates, Robert M. Goodman, William G. Ruesink, Susan E. Halbert, Alberto Fereres, Shaun L. Winterton, Scott A. Isard and Brian M. Wiegmann. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Environmental Entomology, Annals of Applied Biology, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Journal of Economic Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact