Michael Decker

106 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael Decker
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 128
  • Space and Planetary Science 20
  • Archeology 148
  • Safety Research 110
  • Classics 38
Replace Alex Roland with:
Alex Roland United States
Frédéric Adam Ireland
Hyejin Youn United States
Eugene Ch’ng China
John Poulter United Kingdom
Alan Chamberlain United Kingdom
José Manuel Galán Spain
Stewart Brand United States
Tom Peters United States
Eugene S. Ferguson United States
Michael Decker relative to Alex Roland United States Alex Roland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Alex Roland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Decker. The network helps show where Michael Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Decker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Decker Line = papers co-authored together Michael Decker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 118 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016145
2 200489
3 200581
4 200970
5 200969
6 200765
7 200643
8 200637
9 200437
10 200834
11 200130
12 201229
13 200426
14 201124
15 201724
16
Perspektiven für menschliches Handeln in der zukünftigen Gesellschaft
200220
17 200419
18 200818
19 200614
20 201013

About Michael Decker

Michael Decker is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 118 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and Historical Studies (14 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (11 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (11 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (9 papers), Technology, Environment, Urban Planning (9 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers), Access Control and Trust (9 papers) and Innovation, Technology, and Society (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (128 citations), Space and Planetary Science (20 citations), Archeology (148 citations), Safety Research (110 citations) and Classics (38 citations). Michael Decker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Torsten Fleischer, Ingrid Ott, Martin Fischer, Miltos Ladikas, Ulrich Fiedeler, Armin Grünwald, Bettina-Johanna Krings, Nora Weinberger, Gotthard Bechmann and Jens Schippl. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Systems, The American Historical Review, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Education and Urban Society and European Journal of Futures Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact