Michael D. Thom
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 12
- Plant and animal studies 8
- Ecology 8
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 6
- Co-authors
- Jane L. Hurst (10 shared papers)Robert J. Beynon (9 shared papers)David W. Macdonald (6 shared papers)William Ollier (3 shared papers)Francine Jury (3 shared papers)Paula Stockley (4 shared papers)Lauren A. Harrington (3 shared papers)Calvin Dytham (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Current Biology (3 papers)Evolution (3 papers)Oikos (2 papers)Animal Behaviour (2 papers)Physiology & Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael D. Thom
25 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Sensory Systems 214
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 494
- Ecology 375
- Developmental Biology 24
- Social Psychology 223
Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Thom
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Thom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Thom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Thom more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Thom
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Thom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Thom. The network helps show where Michael D. Thom may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Thom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 179 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 161 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 153 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 70 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 62 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 54 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 9 |
About Michael D. Thom
Michael D. Thom is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics, Social Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (214 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (494 citations), Ecology (375 citations), Developmental Biology (24 citations) and Social Psychology (223 citations). Michael D. Thom has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane L. Hurst, Robert J. Beynon, David W. Macdonald, William Ollier, Francine Jury, Paula Stockley, Lauren A. Harrington, Calvin Dytham, Amy L. Sherborne and Steve Paterson. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Evolution, Oikos, Animal Behaviour and Physiology & Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.