Michael D. Stenner

913 citations
32 papers · 640 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Michael D. Stenner

30 papers receiving 594 citations

Peers

Michael D. Stenner
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 76
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 578
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 253
  • Artificial Intelligence 97
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 21
Replace Tarak Nath Dey with:
Tarak Nath Dey India
Alex Dikopoltsev Israel
Shashi Prabhakar India
Bhaskar Kanseri India
Xiaoxue Yang China
Lu‐Feng Qiao China
Pu Jian France
Heli Valtna-Lukner Estonia
M. Shuker Israel
Taira Giordani Italy
Michael D. Stenner relative to Tarak Nath Dey India Tarak Nath Dey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Tarak Nath Dey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Stenner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Stenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Stenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Stenner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Stenner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Stenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Stenner. The network helps show where Michael D. Stenner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Stenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael D. Stenner Line = papers co-authored together Michael D. Stenner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003251
2 2005112
3 200854
4 200547
5 200737
6 200121
7 200721
8 200315
9 199913
10 20089
11 20089
12 20128
13 20138
14 20055
15 20074
16 20073
17 20143
18 20043
19 20112
20 20102

About Michael D. Stenner

Michael D. Stenner is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 32 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum optics and atomic interactions (16 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (12 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (8 papers), Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (6 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (4 papers), Optical Network Technologies (4 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (4 papers) and Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (76 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (578 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (253 citations), Artificial Intelligence (97 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (21 citations). Michael D. Stenner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Gauthier, Mark A. Neifeld, Zhaoming Zhu, Ravi Pant, Andrew M. C. Dawes, Zhimin Shi, Olivier Pfister, Robert W. Boyd, William Brown and Michael E. Gehm. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Nature, Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Optics and Photonics News.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact