Michael Burns

39 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Health Informatics 45
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 245
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 309
  • Accounting 107
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 112
Replace David Kershaw with:
David Kershaw United States
Michael G. Endres United States
Фредрик Андерссон Sweden
Eric D. Carlson United States
R. Edward Hendrick United States
Jean‐Philippe Boucher France
Thomas de Lange Norway
Ziwei Wang China
Q. Li China
Michael Burns relative to David Kershaw United States David Kershaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David Kershaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Burns. The network helps show where Michael Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Burns Line = papers co-authored together Michael Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Positron-electron pairs in astrophysics
1983215
2 2019158
3 1976146
4 2009134
5 202086
6 200374
7 198251
8 202051
9 202229
10 201927
11 202025
12 201425
13 202020
14 200220
15
Positron-electron pairs in astrophysics; Proceedings of the Workshop, Greenbelt, MD, January 6-8, 1983
198317
16 198416
17 199613
18 202112
19 200211
20 20027

About Michael Burns

Michael Burns is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health Informatics and Surgery, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (6 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (6 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (6 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (3 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (45 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (245 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (309 citations), Accounting (107 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (112 citations). Michael Burns has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include A. K. Harding, R. Ramaty, John E. Prescott, Bongjin Kim, T. M. Brown, C. C. Grimes, Sachin Kheterpal, R. V. E. Lovelace, Leif Saager and Michael R. Mathis. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, npj Digital Medicine, The Astrophysical Journal and JAMA Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact