Michael B. King

35 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael B. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Clinical Psychology 439
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 69
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 271
  • Applied Psychology 73
  • Social Psychology 291
Replace Michele J. Karel with:
Michele J. Karel United States
Alexis Kuerbis United States
Karen L. Cropsey United States
Cynthia D. Zubritsky United States
Peter Doré United States
Declan T. Barry United States
Ann A. Hohmann United States
Tom Palmstierna Sweden
Audrey Burnam United States
Robert L. Johnson United States
Michael B. King relative to Michele J. Karel United States Michele J. Karel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michele J. Karel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael B. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael B. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael B. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael B. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael B. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael B. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael B. King. The network helps show where Michael B. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael B. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael B. King Line = papers co-authored together Michael B. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013249
2 2000248
3 1997207
4 2007171
5 1999125
6 199396
7 200662
8 200361
9 198659
10 198855
11
Long term use of benzodiazepines: the views of patients.
199043
12 200343
13 201138
14 199237
15 201132
16 200431
17 200630
18 201728
19 198927
20 200825

About Michael B. King

Michael B. King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers) and Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (439 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (69 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (271 citations), Applied Psychology (73 citations) and Social Psychology (291 citations). Michael B. King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon Read, Jan Neeleman, Peter Bower, E. S. Ward, Mark Gabbay, Bonnie Sibbald, Irwin Nazareth, Mitul Ashok Mehta, Luke Clark and Filippo Passetti. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Psychological Medicine, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, AIDS Care and Schizophrenia Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact