Michael A. Chilbert

26 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers

Michael A. Chilbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 9
  • Ophthalmology 32
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 61
  • Surgery 99
  • Neurology 19
Replace Soroush Assari with:
Soroush Assari United States
Volker Schuchardt Germany
Bruce M. Cameron United States
Christelle Blanc France
MAURICE ROUSSO Israel
Christian Kowalski Germany
Masayuki Kawada Japan
Keiji Sato Japan
Seelora Sahu India
Lei Wan China
Michael A. Chilbert relative to Soroush Assari United States Soroush Assari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Soroush Assari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Chilbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Chilbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Chilbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Chilbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Chilbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Chilbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Chilbert. The network helps show where Michael A. Chilbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Chilbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Chilbert Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Chilbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198394
2 198538
3 198137
4 198126
5 200315
6 198315
7
A new technique for subchoroidal implantation of experimental malignant melanoma.
198814
8 198313
9 198811
10 19827
11 20056
12 19816
13 19836
14 19855
15 19984
16 19854
17 19832
18 19902
19 19882
20 20052

About Michael A. Chilbert

Michael A. Chilbert is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (9 papers), Electrical Fault Detection and Protection (7 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (6 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (3 papers), Electrostatic Discharge in Electronics (3 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (9 citations), Ophthalmology (32 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (61 citations), Surgery (99 citations) and Neurology (19 citations). Michael A. Chilbert has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Sances, Joel B. Myklebust, Sanford J. Larson, Dennis Jay Maiman, Thomas E. Prieto, Thomas J. Swiontek, Joseph F. Cusick, Karl Pintar, George A. Williams and Joseph C. Darin. Their work appears in journals such as Neurosurgery, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Journal of Biomechanics and Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact