Mia Costa
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Politics and Representation
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Papers in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 13
-
- Gender Politics and Representation 10
- Gender Diversity and Inequality 2
- Co-authors
- Brian Schaffner (3 shared papers)Bruce Desmarais (1 shared paper)John Hird (1 shared paper)A.K. Milne (1 shared paper)Jill S. Greenlee (2 shared papers)Tatishe Nteta (2 shared papers)Jesse H. Rhodes (2 shared papers)John Holbein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- American Politics Research (3 papers)Research & Politics (2 papers)Political Behavior (2 papers)The American Review of Public Administration (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Political Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mia Costa
15 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Gender Studies 138
- Political Science and International Relations 189
- Communication 55
- Public Administration 18
- Sociology and Political Science 145
Countries citing papers authored by Mia Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Mia Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mia Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mia Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mia Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mia Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mia Costa. The network helps show where Mia Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mia Costa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 121 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1 |
About Mia Costa
Mia Costa is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Communication, having authored 15 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (13 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (10 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (4 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (1 paper) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (138 citations), Political Science and International Relations (189 citations), Communication (55 citations), Public Administration (18 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (145 citations). Mia Costa has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian Schaffner, Bruce Desmarais, John Hird, A.K. Milne, Jill S. Greenlee, Tatishe Nteta, Jesse H. Rhodes, John Holbein, Charles Crabtree and John J. Cho. Their work appears in journals such as American Politics Research, Research & Politics, Political Behavior, The American Review of Public Administration and Journal of Experimental Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.