Meredith McQuerry

28 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Meredith McQuerry
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Occupational Therapy 158
  • Polymers and Plastics 115
  • Physiology 134
  • Social Psychology 103
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 40
Replace Janice Huck with:
Janice Huck United States
Chinmei Chou Taiwan
Lucy E. Dorman United Kingdom
Elizabeth M. Crown Canada
Gemma Milligan United Kingdom
Anna Marszałek Poland
Jeong‐Wha Choi South Korea
Sumit Mandal United States
Stephen A. Paskaluk Canada
Shigeru TOMITA Japan
Meredith McQuerry relative to Janice Huck United States Janice Huck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.7×
Janice Huck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith McQuerry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith McQuerry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith McQuerry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith McQuerry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith McQuerry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith McQuerry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith McQuerry. The network helps show where Meredith McQuerry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Meredith McQuerry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith McQuerry Line = papers co-authored together Meredith McQuerry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202066
2 201437
3 201834
4 201527
5 201923
6 201722
7 201921
8 201620
9 201816
10 201615
11 202313
12 20229
13 20187
14 20227
15 20167
16 20186
17 20196
18 20196
19 20175
20 20223

About Meredith McQuerry

Meredith McQuerry is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Social Psychology, Physiology, Polymers and Plastics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (26 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (18 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (15 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (10 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (4 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (4 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (3 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (158 citations), Polymers and Plastics (115 citations), Physiology (134 citations), Social Psychology (103 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (40 citations). Meredith McQuerry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and China. Frequent co-authors include Roger Barker, Emiel DenHartog, Alex Cao, Emiel den Hartog, Huiju Park, James Tuttle, Ziwen Qiu, Alexis Chavez, Joseph G. Grzywacz and Michael J. Ormsbee. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Textile Research Journal, Fire Technology, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology and Journal of Safety Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact