Melissa W. Wright

2.6k citations
58 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Melissa W. Wright

50 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Melissa W. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Public Administration 119
  • Geography, Planning and Development 172
  • Urban Studies 170
  • Gender Studies 233
  • Sociology and Political Science 987
Replace Richa Nagar with:
Richa Nagar Czechia
Terry McGee Canada
Nina Laurie United Kingdom
Cathy McIlwaine United Kingdom
David Featherstone United Kingdom
Carla Freeman United States
Anne Bonds United States
Davina Cooper United Kingdom
Jane L. Collins United States
Sara C. Motta Australia
Melissa W. Wright relative to Richa Nagar Czechia Richa Nagar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Richa Nagar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melissa W. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa W. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa W. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa W. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa W. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa W. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa W. Wright. The network helps show where Melissa W. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melissa W. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melissa W. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Melissa W. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Geographies of Power: Placing Scale
2002209
2 2011184
3 2013173
4 199792
5 200481
6 201079
7 200871
8 199970
9 201762
10 200146
11 200942
12 199839
13 200837
14 200134
15 200632
16 201626
17 201426
18 200525
19 200922
20 200722

About Melissa W. Wright

Melissa W. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies and Public Administration, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Latin American and Latino Studies (13 papers), Sex work and related issues (13 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (7 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (119 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (172 citations), Urban Studies (170 citations), Gender Studies (233 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (987 citations). Melissa W. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Herod, Noel Castree, Beverley Mullings, Kate Driscoll Derickson, Matthew Sparke, Marion Werner, Bradley Wilson, Nik Heynen, Steven Sutcliffe and Paul Chatterton. Their work appears in journals such as Antipode, Geoforum, Environment and Planning D Society and Space, Progress in Human Geography and Hypatia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact