Melanie Ring

23 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Melanie Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Developmental Neuroscience 93
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 237
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 133
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 47
  • Genetics 89
Replace Dean D’Souza with:
Dean D’Souza United Kingdom
Marie Moore Channell United States
Holly Zajac Gastgeb United States
Angela E. John United States
Hannah Kirk Australia
Samantha Bellucci Italy
Luigi Marotta Italy
Lucie Bouvet France
Anna Järvinen‐Pasley United Kingdom
Susan Peppé United Kingdom
Melanie Ring relative to Dean D’Souza United Kingdom Dean D’Souza's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Dean D’Souza · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Ring. The network helps show where Melanie Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Ring Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202068
2 200562
3 201537
4
Lexical and morphological skills in English-speaking children with Williams Syndrome
200329
5 201528
6 201821
7 200419
8 201814
9 201713
10
Morphosyntax in down’s syndrome: is the extended optional infinitive hypothesis an option?
201111
11 202011
12 201610
13 202310
14 20179
15 20178
16 20248
17 20196
18 20174
19 20234
20 20244

About Melanie Ring

Melanie Ring is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Developmental Neuroscience, Genetics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (19 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (9 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Williams Syndrome Research (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (93 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (237 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (133 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (47 citations) and Genetics (89 citations). Melanie Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Harald Clahsen, Dermot Bowler, Sebastian Gaigg, Christine M. Temple, Bérengère Guillery‐Girard, Jean‐Marc Baleyte, Jean‐Jacques Parienti, Priscille Gérardin, Anaïs R. Briant and Fabian Guenolé. Their work appears in journals such as Autism Research, BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Autism and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact