Melanie Ring

22 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Melanie Ring
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Developmental Neuroscience 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 214
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 109
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 46
  • Genetics 85
Replace Holly Zajac Gastgeb with:
Holly Zajac Gastgeb United States
Luigi Marotta Italy
Dean D’Souza United Kingdom
Hannah Kirk Australia
Samantha Bellucci Italy
Lucie Bouvet France
Judith Piggot United States
Alexandra Perovic United Kingdom
Angela E. John United States
Susan Peppé United Kingdom
Melanie Ring relative to Holly Zajac Gastgeb United States Holly Zajac Gastgeb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Holly Zajac Gastgeb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Ring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Ring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Ring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Ring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Ring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Ring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Ring. The network helps show where Melanie Ring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melanie Ring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanie Ring Line = papers co-authored together Melanie Ring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202061
2 200547
3 201537
4 201527
5
Lexical and morphological skills in English-speaking children with Williams Syndrome
200327
6 201819
7 201813
8 201712
9 202011
10
Morphosyntax in down’s syndrome: is the extended optional infinitive hypothesis an option?
201111
11 20179
12 20169
13 20178
14 20237
15 20246
16 20196
17 20234
18 20174
19 20244
20 20251

About Melanie Ring

Melanie Ring is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (19 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (9 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Williams Syndrome Research (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (63 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (214 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (109 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (46 citations) and Genetics (85 citations). Melanie Ring has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dermot Bowler, Sebastian Gaigg, Harald Clahsen, Christine M. Temple, Bérengère Guillery‐Girard, Francis Eustache, Jean‐Marc Baleyte, Priscille Gérardin, Jean‐Jacques Parienti and Fabian Guenolé. Their work appears in journals such as Autism Research, BMC Psychiatry, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, Autism and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact