Melanee Thomas

627 citations
25 papers · 390 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Melanee Thomas

24 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

Melanee Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Gender Studies 223
  • Political Science and International Relations 174
  • General Energy 5
  • Communication 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 137
Replace Seiki Tanaka with:
Seiki Tanaka Netherlands
Alexandra E. Cirone United States
Lori Thorlakson Canada
Conor Little Ireland
Gisela Zaremberg Mexico
Dirk Tomsa Australia
Isabelle Guinaudeau France
Johannes Pollak Austria
Clara Volintiru Romania
Judith Gardam Australia
Melanee Thomas relative to Seiki Tanaka Netherlands Seiki Tanaka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×12×
Seiki Tanaka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanee Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanee Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanee Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanee Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanee Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanee Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanee Thomas. The network helps show where Melanee Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Melanee Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanee Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Melanee Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201287
2 202271
3 200844
4 201640
5 201232
6 201819
7 202015
8 202112
9 202112
10 20219
11 20178
12 20197
13 20236
14 20215
15 20175
16
Barriers to Women's Political Participation in Canada
20133
17 20183
18 20193
19 20182
20 20242

About Melanee Thomas

Melanee Thomas is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 25 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (13 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers), Canadian Identity and History (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (223 citations), Political Science and International Relations (174 citations), General Energy (5 citations), Communication (29 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (137 citations). Melanee Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc André Bodet, Lori Thorlakson, Elisabeth Gidengil, Allison Harell, Amanda Bittner, Erin Tolley, Julie Blais, Christian Henning Schimpf, Scott Pruysers and Elizabeth Pando. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, Journal of Women Politics & Policy, Political Behavior and PS Political Science & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact