Mél Hogan
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
-
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Privacy, Security, and Data Protection 2
-
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI 6
- Co-authors
- Tamara Shepherd (3 shared papers)Alison Harvey (1 shared paper)Rena Bivens (1 shared paper)Gwendolyn Blue (2 shared papers)Sarah Roberts (2 shared papers)Libby Hemphill (1 shared paper)Deb Verhoeven (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Work Organisation Labour & Globalisation (1 paper)Television & New Media (1 paper)First Monday (1 paper)Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes (1 paper)New Media & Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mél Hogan
29 papers receiving 310 citations
Mél Hogan's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Human-Computer Interaction 27
- Communication 33
- Safety Research 37
- Computer Science Applications 18
- Geography, Planning and Development 18
Countries citing papers authored by Mél Hogan
This map shows the geographic impact of Mél Hogan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mél Hogan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mél Hogan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mél Hogan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mél Hogan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mél Hogan. The network helps show where Mél Hogan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mél Hogan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 161 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 40 | |
| 4 | The making of critical data center studies Hit paper breakdown → | 2024 | 24 |
| 5 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 2 |
About Mél Hogan
Mél Hogan is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Conservation, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 36 papers that have together received 405 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (6 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (5 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (4 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (2 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (2 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (2 papers), DNA and Biological Computing (2 papers) and Cellular Automata and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (27 citations), Communication (33 citations), Safety Research (37 citations), Computer Science Applications (18 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (18 citations). Mél Hogan has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tamara Shepherd, Alison Harvey, Rena Bivens, Gwendolyn Blue, Sarah Roberts, Libby Hemphill and Deb Verhoeven. Their work appears in journals such as Work Organisation Labour & Globalisation, Television & New Media, First Monday, Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes and New Media & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.