Megan E. Frederickson

69 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Megan E. Frederickson
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.4k
  • Insect Science 579
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 320
  • Plant Science 903
Replace Joel L. Sachs with:
Joel L. Sachs United States
Mark D. E. Fellowes United Kingdom
John L. Capinera United States
Bitty A. Roy United States
Daniel J. Rankin Switzerland
Lori Stevens United States
Jacqueline R. Beggs New Zealand
Timothy P. Craig United States
Christoph Vorburger Switzerland
J. Howard Frank United States
Megan E. Frederickson relative to Joel L. Sachs United States Joel L. Sachs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joel L. Sachs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan E. Frederickson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan E. Frederickson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan E. Frederickson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan E. Frederickson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan E. Frederickson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan E. Frederickson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan E. Frederickson. The network helps show where Megan E. Frederickson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan E. Frederickson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan E. Frederickson Line = papers co-authored together Megan E. Frederickson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013216
2 2011127
3 2015118
4 2013113
5 201492
6 201087
7 200587
8 202077
9 201776
10 201774
11 201871
12 200562
13 201361
14 200459
15 201650
16 201250
17 201648
18 200946
19 201446
20 201345

About Megan E. Frederickson

Megan E. Frederickson is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science, Insect Science and Ecology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (47 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (36 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (24 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (13 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (12 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (8 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (8 papers) and Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.4k citations), Insect Science (579 citations), Genetics (1.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (320 citations) and Plant Science (903 citations). Megan E. Frederickson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Naomi E. Pierce, Deborah M. Gordon, Douglas W. Yu, Anna O'Brien, Rebecca T. Batstone, Jon G. Sanders, Daniel J. C. Kronauer, Scott Powell, Heraldo L. Vasconcelos and Kirsten M. Prior. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, The American Naturalist, Oecologia, Insectes Sociaux and Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact