Meg E. Wise

9 papers receiving 779 citations

Meg E. Wise's Hit Papers

Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application 2007 · 737 citations
7370+6+12Years since publication200400600

Peers

Meg E. Wise
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Literature and Literary Theory 407
  • Communication 190
  • Applied Psychology 65
  • Gender Studies 74
  • Health 43
Replace Sabra Farwell Woolley with:
Sabra Farwell Woolley United States
Samantha Nazione United States
Charee M. Thompson United States
Jenifer E. Kopfman United States
Nicky Lewis United States
Sohad Murrar United States
Kirsten Weber United States
Jeanette M. Renaud United States
Valerie J. Young United States
Kevin R. Meyer United States
Meg E. Wise relative to Sabra Farwell Woolley United States Sabra Farwell Woolley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sabra Farwell Woolley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meg E. Wise

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meg E. Wise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meg E. Wise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meg E. Wise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meg E. Wise

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meg E. Wise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meg E. Wise. The network helps show where Meg E. Wise may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meg E. Wise, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meg E. Wise Line = papers co-authored together Meg E. Wise links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application
Hit paper breakdown →
2007737
2 201625
3 201618
4 201915
5 20174
6
Cancer-Related Information Seeking Within an Interactive Health Communication System: An Application of the Comprehensive Model of Information Seeking (CMIS)
20082
7
Mind Over Matter; Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder: An Individually Randomized Group Treatment Trial
20181
8 20201
9 20201

About Meg E. Wise

Meg E. Wise is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery, Speech and Hearing, Literature and Literary Theory and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 804 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (1 paper), Empathy and Medical Education (1 paper), Media Influence and Health (1 paper) and Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (407 citations), Communication (190 citations), Applied Psychology (65 citations), Gender Studies (74 citations) and Health (43 citations). Meg E. Wise has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Thomas K. Houston, D. Storey, Daniel J. O’Keefe, Leslie Hinyard, Joseph N. Cappella, Matthew W. Kreuter, Melanie C. Green, Deborah O. Erwin, Michael D. Slater and Eddie M. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as International Urogynecology Journal, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, BMC Medical Education, Neurourology and Urodynamics and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact