M.C. Grieve
Impact in
- Archeology top 1%
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Safety Research top 1%
- Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Papers in
- Archeology 22
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 22
-
- Textile materials and evaluations 19
- Polymer crystallization and properties 4
- Co-authors
- Thomas Biermann (9 shared papers)Kenneth G. Wiggins (2 shared papers)Claude Patrick Roux (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Science & Justice (17 papers)Journal of Forensic Sciences (9 papers)Forensic Science International (6 papers)Journal of the Forensic Science Society (6 papers)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M.C. Grieve
38 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Archeology 291
- Safety Research 310
- Polymers and Plastics 235
- Law 135
- Analytical Chemistry 99
Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Grieve
This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Grieve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Grieve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Grieve. The network helps show where M.C. Grieve may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 54 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 43 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 40 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1992 | 37 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 31 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1997 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 16 |
About M.C. Grieve
M.C. Grieve is a scholar working on Archeology, Polymers and Plastics, Safety Research, Law and Building and Construction, having authored 39 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (22 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (19 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (16 papers), Legal processes and jurisprudence (11 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (9 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Polymer crystallization and properties (4 papers) and Fashion and Cultural Textiles (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (291 citations), Safety Research (310 citations), Polymers and Plastics (235 citations), Law (135 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (99 citations). M.C. Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Biermann, Kenneth G. Wiggins and Claude Patrick Roux. Their work appears in journals such as Science & Justice, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International, Journal of the Forensic Science Society and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.