M.C. Grieve

1.0k citations
39 papers · 759 · h-index 18

Impact in

    • Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
  • Archeology top 1%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Papers in

M.C. Grieve

39 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

M.C. Grieve
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Safety Research 218
  • Archeology 237
  • Polymers and Plastics 197
  • Analytical Chemistry 88
  • Genetics 222
Replace K.G. Wiggins with:
K.G. Wiggins United Kingdom
Thomas Biermann Germany
C.A. Pounds United Kingdom
Ray Palmer United Kingdom
Patrick Buzzini United States
Geneviève Massonnet Switzerland
K. De Wael Belgium
Jolanta Wąs-Gubała Poland
Laurent Lepot Belgium
Sergio Schiavone Italy
M.C. Grieve relative to K.G. Wiggins United Kingdom K.G. Wiggins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
K.G. Wiggins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Grieve

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Grieve more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Grieve

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Grieve. The network helps show where M.C. Grieve may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Grieve, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.C. Grieve Line = papers co-authored together M.C. Grieve links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199755
2 200144
3 199543
4 199238
5 198837
6 200333
7 200532
8 198931
9 199726
10 199825
11 200625
12 199724
13 199623
14 198322
15 199222
16 199822
17 200119
18 197719
19 199617
20 199015

About M.C. Grieve

M.C. Grieve is a scholar working on Polymers and Plastics, Safety Research, Genetics, Archeology and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 39 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Textile materials and evaluations (12 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (7 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (6 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (4 papers), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (3 papers), Material Properties and Processing (3 papers), Plant Surface Properties and Treatments (2 papers) and Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (218 citations), Archeology (237 citations), Polymers and Plastics (197 citations), Analytical Chemistry (88 citations) and Genetics (222 citations). M.C. Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Biermann, K.G. Wiggins, Ronald F. Malone, Jared A. Kearns, Claude Roux, Randy Hanzlick, Ralph F. Turner, Victor W. Weedn, David A. Stoney and A. Koutselinis. Their work appears in journals such as Science & Justice, Journal of Forensic Sciences, Forensic Science International and Journal of the Forensic Science Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact