M.C. Gnädinger

403 citations
20 papers · 327 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M.C. Gnädinger

10 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

M.C. Gnädinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Ophthalmology 94
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 154
  • Equine 6
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 89
  • Cancer Research 40
Replace Gysbert‐Botho van Setten with:
Gysbert‐Botho van Setten Sweden
Laura García-Posadas Spain
Ulrich Welge‐Luessen Germany
C Katakami Japan
Tomoko Orita Japan
Peter Rieck Germany
Caitlin M. Logan United States
Shinichiro Teranishi Japan
Soon-Suk Kang South Korea
Jiahui Wu United States
M.C. Gnädinger relative to Gysbert‐Botho van Setten Sweden Gysbert‐Botho van Setten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gysbert‐Botho van Setten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.C. Gnädinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.C. Gnädinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.C. Gnädinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.C. Gnädinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.C. Gnädinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.C. Gnädinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.C. Gnädinger. The network helps show where M.C. Gnädinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside M.C. Gnädinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.C. Gnädinger Line = papers co-authored together M.C. Gnädinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 196978
2 197156
3 196956
4 196955
5 197327
6 196417
7 196717
8 19698
9 19767
10
[Role of the epithelium in corneal healing].
19722
11
[On the problem of the effect of ascorbic acid on normal intraocular pressure in local application].
19682
12 19721
13 19721
14 20100
15 20100
16 20100
17 20100
18 20100
19 20090
20 20090

About M.C. Gnädinger

M.C. Gnädinger is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Rheumatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 20 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Connective tissue disorders research (2 papers) and Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (94 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (154 citations), Equine (6 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (89 citations) and Cancer Research (40 citations). M.C. Gnädinger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Claes H. Dohlman, H. H. Slansky, Motokazu Itoi, M Itoi, M Berman, Peter F. Davison, Ruth Heimann, R. Markstein, Ernst H. Bárány and Felix Grün. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Eye Research, Ophthalmologica, Ophthalmic Research, Cornea and Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact