M.B. Starling

15 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

M.B. Starling
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 258
  • Epidemiology 220
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 33
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 132
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 71
Replace Debra F. Anderson with:
Debra F. Anderson United States
D Cianciulli Italy
Benjamin J. Freda United States
M. M. Mitchell United States
Cynthia R. Reed United States
W. M. Thurlbeck Canada
F. Daoud United States
Chung-Bin Huang Taiwan
Morteza Amidi United States
Ramiro Trillo Spain
M.B. Starling relative to Debra F. Anderson United States Debra F. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Debra F. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M.B. Starling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M.B. Starling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.B. Starling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.B. Starling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M.B. Starling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.B. Starling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.B. Starling. The network helps show where M.B. Starling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside M.B. Starling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M.B. Starling Line = papers co-authored together M.B. Starling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1975144
2 197496
3 197793
4 197225
5 197921
6 197420
7 198420
8 197613
9 198113
10 197410
11 19784
12
Effects of Prostaglandin E1, prostacyclin, and tolazoline on elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in neonatal swine.
19804
13 19903
14 19853
15
Effects of prostacyclin on cardiopulmonary bypass-mediated lung damage using extravascular lung water measurements.
19872

About M.B. Starling

M.B. Starling is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (6 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (2 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (258 citations), Epidemiology (220 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (33 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (132 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (71 citations). M.B. Starling has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Robert B. Elliott, Janet A. Neutze, Robert Elliott, John M. Neutze, Brian G. Barratt‐Boyes, Robert L. Elliott, J. M. A. Brown, V. J. Chapman, A. Louise Calder and John G.F. Cleland. Their work appears in journals such as Prostaglandins, Hydrobiologia, Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, Circulation and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact