Max E. Godfrey

13 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Max E. Godfrey
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Epidemiology 191
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 87
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 25
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 28
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 33
Replace Virginia Silva with:
Virginia Silva United States
Priya Sekar United States
Christine B. Falkensammer United States
Mubadda A. Salim United States
Nathalie Jeanne Bravo‐Valenzuela Brazil
D. Rosenak Israel
Andreea Kawecki Germany
Mary Craft United States
I B Vijayalakshmi India
Angela McBrien Canada
Max E. Godfrey relative to Virginia Silva United States Virginia Silva's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Virginia Silva · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max E. Godfrey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max E. Godfrey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max E. Godfrey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max E. Godfrey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max E. Godfrey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max E. Godfrey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max E. Godfrey. The network helps show where Max E. Godfrey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max E. Godfrey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max E. Godfrey Line = papers co-authored together Max E. Godfrey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201780
2 201178
3 202138
4 201229
5 201621
6 201420
7 202220
8
The incidence of congenital heart defects in very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants.
201017
9 201812
10 20168
11 20213
12 20122
13 20212

About Max E. Godfrey

Max E. Godfrey is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (8 papers), Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (1 paper), Viral Infections and Immunology Research (1 paper), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (191 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (87 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (25 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (28 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (33 citations). Max E. Godfrey has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. M. Cohen, Simcha Yagel, Baruch Messing, Dan Vadim Valsky, Wayne Tworetzky, Kevin G. Friedman, Monika Drogosz, Audrey Chung Marshall, Lindsay R. Freud and Louise E. Wilkins-Haug. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, International Journal of Cardiology, European Heart Journal and Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact