Max Brugh

46 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Max Brugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Animal Science and Zoology 506
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 486
  • Epidemiology 890
  • Infectious Diseases 434
  • Microbiology 114
Replace W.H. Allan with:
W.H. Allan United Arab Emirates
In-Pil Mo South Korea
Sherrill Davison United States
Elsayed M. Abdelwhab Germany
Monique França United States
Hye-Young Jeoung South Korea
Naresh Jindal India
Roman M. Pogranichniy United States
A. A. Bickford United States
Hüseyin Yılmaz Türkiye
Max Brugh relative to W.H. Allan United Arab Emirates W.H. Allan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W.H. Allan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Brugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Brugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Brugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Brugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Brugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Brugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Brugh. The network helps show where Max Brugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Brugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Brugh Line = papers co-authored together Max Brugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997119
2 1978110
3 197885
4 198550
5 198550
6 197747
7 199646
8 197946
9 199746
10 197844
11 198444
12 197541
13
Laboratory studies with the Pennsylvania avian influenza viruses (H5N2)
198436
14 199635
15 198034
16 199730
17
Influence of formulation on the efficacy of experimental oil-emulsion Newcastle disease vaccines.
198328
18 198827
19 198727
20 198026

About Max Brugh

Max Brugh is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (25 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (18 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (16 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (14 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (6 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (5 papers) and Viral Infections and Immunology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (506 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (486 citations), Epidemiology (890 citations), Infectious Diseases (434 citations) and Microbiology (114 citations). Max Brugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include C. W. Beard, H. D. Stone, David E. Swayne, Michael L. Perdue, Oscar J. Fletcher, G. N. Rowland, In-Pil Mo, Harry W. Yoder, Bailey W. Mitchell and Robert G. Webster. Their work appears in journals such as Avian Diseases, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of Wildlife Diseases, Journal of Virology and Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact