Max Brugh

1.5k citations
46 papers · 1.2k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Max Brugh

46 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Max Brugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Animal Science and Zoology 492
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 482
  • Epidemiology 854
  • Infectious Diseases 414
  • Microbiology 112
Replace W.H. Allan with:
W.H. Allan United Arab Emirates
In-Pil Mo South Korea
Elsayed M. Abdelwhab Germany
Hye-Young Jeoung South Korea
Monique França United States
T. Fabri Netherlands
Naresh Jindal India
Hüseyin Yılmaz Türkiye
Roberta De Nardi Italy
Nuri Turan Türkiye
Max Brugh relative to W.H. Allan United Arab Emirates W.H. Allan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
W.H. Allan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Max Brugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Max Brugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Brugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Brugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Max Brugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Brugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Brugh. The network helps show where Max Brugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Max Brugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Max Brugh Line = papers co-authored together Max Brugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997111
2 1978108
3 197884
4 198547
5 199647
6 199743
7 197742
8 197541
9 197941
10 197841
11 198440
12 198538
13 199635
14
Laboratory studies with the Pennsylvania avian influenza viruses (H5N2)
198434
15 198032
16 199731
17 198827
18 198026
19
Influence of formulation on the efficacy of experimental oil-emulsion Newcastle disease vaccines.
198326
20
Emergence of highly pathogenic virus during selective chicken passage of the prototype mildly pathogenic chicken/Pennsylvania/83 (H5N2) influenza virus.
199225

About Max Brugh

Max Brugh is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (25 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (18 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (16 papers), Virology and Viral Diseases (14 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (6 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (6 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (5 papers) and Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (492 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (482 citations), Epidemiology (854 citations), Infectious Diseases (414 citations) and Microbiology (112 citations). Max Brugh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include C. W. Beard, H. D. Stone, David E. Swayne, Michael L. Perdue, In-Pil Mo, Harry W. Yoder, Oscar J. Fletcher, G. N. Rowland, Bailey W. Mitchell and S. R. Hopkins. Their work appears in journals such as Avian Diseases, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Virus Research, Poultry Science and Virus Genes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact