Matt Holzer

21 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers

Matt Holzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Modeling and Simulation 57
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 86
  • Numerical Analysis 28
  • Computer Networks and Communications 116
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 113
Replace Wayne Nagata with:
Wayne Nagata Canada
Peter van Heijster Australia
Geertje Hek Netherlands
Grégory Faye France
Gaihui Guo China
Genghong Lin China
G. Gambino Italy
Hiroki Yagisita Japan
Saïd Kouachi Saudi Arabia
Matt Holzer relative to Wayne Nagata Canada Wayne Nagata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Wayne Nagata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matt Holzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Holzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Holzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Holzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Holzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Holzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Holzer. The network helps show where Matt Holzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Matt Holzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matt Holzer Line = papers co-authored together Matt Holzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200856
2 201430
3 201428
4 201227
5 201222
6 201321
7 200410
8 20179
9 20159
10 20037
11 20186
12 20086
13 20235
14 20185
15 20145
16 20234
17 20224
18 20203
19 20212
20 20181

About Matt Holzer

Matt Holzer is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Computer Networks and Communications, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Genetics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (12 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (10 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers), stochastic dynamics and bifurcation (4 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (3 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (3 papers) and Numerical methods for differential equations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (57 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (86 citations), Numerical Analysis (28 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (116 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (113 citations). Matt Holzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Arnd Scheel, Tasso J. Kaper, Anthony Harkin, Robert Deville, Krešimir Josić́, Arjen Doelman, Nikola Popović, Grégory Faye, Mark Pernarowski and Montie Avery. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nonlinear Science, Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Nonlinearity and SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact