Massimo Renzo

674 citations
31 papers · 241 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Massimo Renzo

26 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

Massimo Renzo
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Philosophy 98
  • Political Science and International Relations 148
  • Law 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 124
Replace David Lefkowitz with:
David Lefkowitz United States
Patrick Tomlin United Kingdom
Rowan Cruft United Kingdom
Claire Finkelstein United States
Mark R. Reiff United States
Matt Matravers United Kingdom
Véronique Munoz‐Dardé United Kingdom
Chaim Gans Israel
S. A. Lloyd United States
Christie Hartley United States
Massimo Renzo relative to David Lefkowitz United States David Lefkowitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
David Lefkowitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Renzo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Renzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Renzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Renzo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Renzo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Renzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Renzo. The network helps show where Massimo Renzo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Massimo Renzo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Massimo Renzo Line = papers co-authored together Massimo Renzo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Boundaries of the Criminal Law
201127
2 201525
3 201224
4 201119
5 201515
6
The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights: An Overview
201513
7 201111
8 201711
9 201311
10 201810
11 20199
12 20139
13
Introduction: Towards a Theory of Criminalization?
20147
14 20227
15 20137
16 20186
17 20185
18 20085
19 20105
20 20194

About Massimo Renzo

Massimo Renzo is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include War, Ethics, and Justification (16 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (13 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (7 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), International Law and Human Rights (5 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (3 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (98 citations), Political Science and International Relations (148 citations), Law (37 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (53 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (124 citations). Massimo Renzo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include S. Matthew Liao, Rowan Cruft, Victor Tadros, Lindsay Farmer, R. A. Duff, S. E. Marshall, Antony Duff and SE Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Law and Philosophy, Criminal Law and Philosophy, Journal of Moral Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact