Massimo Renzo

669 citations
23 papers · 136 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Massimo Renzo

19 papers receiving 128 citations

Peers

Massimo Renzo
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Philosophy 70
  • Political Science and International Relations 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 69
  • Law 14
Replace Claire Finkelstein with:
Claire Finkelstein United States
Herlinde Pauer‐Studer Austria
David Lefkowitz United States
Rowan Cruft United Kingdom
Matt Matravers United Kingdom
Bas van der Vossen United States
Helga Varden United States
Christopher J. Eberle United States
Patrick Tomlin United Kingdom
Chaim Gans Israel
Massimo Renzo relative to Claire Finkelstein United States Claire Finkelstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Claire Finkelstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo Renzo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo Renzo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo Renzo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo Renzo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo Renzo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo Renzo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo Renzo. The network helps show where Massimo Renzo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Massimo Renzo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Massimo Renzo Line = papers co-authored together Massimo Renzo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Boundaries of the Criminal Law
201122
2 201220
3 201116
4 201810
5 20118
6 20178
7 20138
8 20137
9 20196
10 20185
11 20225
12 20084
13 20184
14 20104
15 20103
16 20192
17 20152
18
Introduction: The Structures of the Criminal Law
20121
19
Human Rights as Fundamental Conditions for a Good Life
20151
20 20130

About Massimo Renzo

Massimo Renzo is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Law, having authored 23 papers that have together received 136 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include War, Ethics, and Justification (13 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (10 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (5 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Law in Society and Culture (3 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (70 citations), Political Science and International Relations (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (35 citations), Sociology and Political Science (69 citations) and Law (14 citations). Massimo Renzo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. E. Marshall, R. A. Duff, Lindsay Farmer, Victor Tadros and Antony Duff. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, Criminal Law and Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of Political Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact