Mary E. Lane

16 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Mary E. Lane
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 317
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 157
  • Rehabilitation 42
  • Occupational Therapy 24
  • Neurology 86
Replace Cornill H. Blauw-Hospers with:
Cornill H. Blauw-Hospers Netherlands
Céline Lepage Canada
Jane Galvin Australia
Alesha Hill United Kingdom
Hayley Smithers‐Sheedy Australia
Owen Lloyd Australia
Ying‐Chia Kao United States
Susan K. Effgen United States
Jill Maggs United States
Janet Lillie United States
Mary E. Lane relative to Cornill H. Blauw-Hospers Netherlands Cornill H. Blauw-Hospers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Cornill H. Blauw-Hospers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Lane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Lane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Lane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Lane. The network helps show where Mary E. Lane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Lane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Lane Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Lane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1998106
2 199585
3 199455
4 200053
5 199151
6 199149
7 197641
8 199136
9 200225
10
Gross motor performance measure for children with cerebral palsy: study design and preliminary findings.
199324
11 197411
12 19748
13 19735
14 19745
15 19742
16
Gross Motor Function Measure (Gmfm) Self-Instructional Training Cd-Rom
20031

About Mary E. Lane

Mary E. Lane is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Neurology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (317 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (157 citations), Rehabilitation (42 citations), Occupational Therapy (24 citations) and Neurology (86 citations). Mary E. Lane has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dianne J Russell, Peter Rosenbaum, Carolyn Anne Gowland, Nancy Plews, Charles H. Goldsmith, William F. Boyce, Aquiles J. Sobrero, Robert J. Palisano, Stephen D. Walter and F. Virginia Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Therapy, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology and Fertility and Sterility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact