Marko Prous
Impact in
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Fossil Insects in Amber
- Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny
- Lichen and fungal ecology
- Insect Science top 10%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Fossil Insects in Amber 32
- Plant and animal studies 28
- Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny 11
- Diptera species taxonomy and behavior 3
- Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies 1
- Genetics 16
- Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy 12
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 4
- Co-authors
- Andrew Liston (24 shared papers)Veli Vikberg (9 shared papers)Katja Kramp (7 shared papers)Erast Parmasto (1 shared paper)Kadri Põldmaa (1 shared paper)Irja Saar (1 shared paper)Märt Toots (1 shared paper)Urmas Kõljalg (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Marko Prous
31 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 309
- Insect Science 93
- Ecological Modeling 28
- Cell Biology 89
- Plant Science 177
Countries citing papers authored by Marko Prous
This map shows the geographic impact of Marko Prous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marko Prous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marko Prous more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marko Prous
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marko Prous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marko Prous. The network helps show where Marko Prous may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marko Prous, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 225 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 17 | Sawflies (Hymenoptera, Symphyta) newly recorded from Sweden. | 2014 | 5 |
| 18 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 3 |
About Marko Prous
Marko Prous is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Molecular Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fossil Insects in Amber (32 papers), Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (12 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (11 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (3 papers) and Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (309 citations), Insect Science (93 citations), Ecological Modeling (28 citations), Cell Biology (89 citations) and Plant Science (177 citations). Marko Prous has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Estonia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Liston, Veli Vikberg, Katja Kramp, Erast Parmasto, Kadri Põldmaa, Irja Saar, Märt Toots, Urmas Kõljalg, Kessy Abarenkov and Leho Tedersoo. Their work appears in journals such as Zootaxa, Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, ZooKeys, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution and Molecular Ecology Resources.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.