Mark Walker

25 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Mark Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 74
  • Artificial Intelligence 139
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 20
  • Computer Science Applications 16
Replace Simon R. Turner with:
Simon R. Turner Canada
Tamas S. Gal United States
Jim Bottomley Canada
Vikrant Deshmukh United States
Catherine Howell United Kingdom
Babak Choodari‐Oskooei United Kingdom
Marge Benham‐Hutchins United States
Teppei Suzuki Japan
Sonya Grenier Canada
Fateme Moghbeli Iran
Mark Walker relative to Simon R. Turner Canada Simon R. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Simon R. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Walker. The network helps show where Mark Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Walker Line = papers co-authored together Mark Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009179
2 198661
3 200851
4 200842
5 201028
6 201119
7 199717
8 200815
9 201213
10 20198
11 20168
12 20227
13 20174
14 20214
15 20173
16 19972
17 20202
18 20242
19 20031
20
Paramedic Learning Style Preferences and Continuing Medical Education Activities: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
20181

About Mark Walker

Mark Walker is a scholar working on Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Adrenal Hormones and Disorders (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (7 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (74 citations), Artificial Intelligence (139 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (20 citations) and Computer Science Applications (16 citations). Mark Walker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tyson Roffey, Jim Bottomley, Khaled El Emam, Jean‐Pierre Corriveau, Régis Vaillancourt, Elise Cogo, Fida K. Dankar, Daniel Amyot, Elizabeth Jonker and Joel Rosenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The American Surgeon, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact