Mark Walker

79 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark Walker
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • General Decision Sciences 165
  • Safety Research 508
  • Management Science and Operations Research 585
  • Economics and Econometrics 723
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 125
Replace L. Robin Keller with:
L. Robin Keller United States
Stephen Morris United States
Jay Christensen-Szalanski United States
Daniel L. Chen France
Ryan Riordan Canada
Donald Young United States
Michael C. Horowitz United States
Emma Pierson United States
Sarah Kreps United States
Matthias Messner Germany
Mark Walker relative to L. Robin Keller United States L. Robin Keller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
L. Robin Keller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Walker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Walker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Walker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Walker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Walker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Walker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Walker. The network helps show where Mark Walker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Walker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Walker Line = papers co-authored together Mark Walker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001236
2 1984176
3 1981140
4 2006105
5 201395
6 198082
7 200071
8 199068
9 197768
10 201151
11 199847
12 201143
13 200935
14 199030
15 201028
16 197927
17 200526
18 200125
19 200324
20 197824

About Mark Walker

Mark Walker is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Philosophy, Safety Research and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (14 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers), Economic theories and models (13 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (9 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (165 citations), Safety Research (508 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (585 citations), Economics and Econometrics (723 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (125 citations). Mark Walker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Wooders, Leonid Hurwicz, James C. Cox, Jason Shachat, Abdool S. Yasseen, Denice S. Feig, Sara A. Finkelstein, Donald E. Campbell, John‏ Kingdom and Dean Fergusson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Theory, Games and Economic Behavior, Econometrica, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada and Placenta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact