Mark W. McLeod

482 citations
18 papers · 230 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Mark W. McLeod

14 papers receiving 159 citations

Peers

Mark W. McLeod
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • History and Philosophy of Science 48
  • Sociology and Political Science 174
  • Political Science and International Relations 69
  • Cultural Studies 22
  • Anthropology 21
Replace Yves Déloye with:
Yves Déloye France
Herman Lebovics United States
Marc Ferro France
Anne‐Marie Thiesse France
Anne Rasmussen United States
Leora Auslander United States
Bertram M. Gordon United States
Neil MacMaster United Kingdom
Giovanni Levi Italy
Nicolas Mariot France
Mark W. McLeod relative to Yves Déloye France Yves Déloye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Yves Déloye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. McLeod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. McLeod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. McLeod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. McLeod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. McLeod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. McLeod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. McLeod. The network helps show where Mark W. McLeod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Mark W. McLeod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark W. McLeod Line = papers co-authored together Mark W. McLeod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199359
2 200256
3 200141
4 199637
5 200312
6 19998
7 19925
8 19943
9 19933
10 19941
11 19931
12 20001
13 19921
14 20181
15 19941
16 20090
17 19930
18
The treaty of Sai-Gon and the Vietnamese response to French intervention, 1862-1874
19880

About Mark W. McLeod

Mark W. McLeod is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 18 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (17 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (10 papers), Cambodian History and Society (2 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (1 paper), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (1 paper), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (1 paper) and Chinese history and philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (48 citations), Sociology and Political Science (174 citations), Political Science and International Relations (69 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations) and Anthropology (21 citations). Mark W. McLeod has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hue-Tam Ho Tai, Pierre Brocheux, Neil L. Jamieson, William J. Duiker and Hy V. Luong. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs, The Journal of Asian Studies, The International History Review and Journal of Southeast Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact