Mark Vessey

701 citations
38 papers · 316 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Classics top 2%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 8
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 7
    • Augustinian Studies and Theology 14

Mark Vessey

19 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Mark Vessey
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Classics 174
  • Anthropology 121
  • History 117
  • Philosophy 96
  • Religious studies 39
Replace Neil Adkin with:
Neil Adkin United States
Danuta Shanzer United States
Stefan Rebenich Germany
Derek Krueger United States
Joseph Goering Canada
Eduard Norden
Gerald Bonner United Kingdom
Peter Van Nuffelen Belgium
Philippe Buc Austria
Martha Malamud United States
Mark Vessey relative to Neil Adkin United States Neil Adkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Neil Adkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Vessey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Vessey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Vessey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Vessey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Vessey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Vessey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Vessey. The network helps show where Mark Vessey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Mark Vessey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Vessey Line = papers co-authored together Mark Vessey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200481
2 199649
3 199342
4 199437
5
Augustine and the disciplines : from Cassiciacum to Confessions
200527
6 199815
7 201212
8 201010
9
History, Apocalypse, and the Secular Imagination: New Essays on Augustine's City of God
19996
10
Institutions of divine and secular learning ; and, On the soul
20044
11 20144
12 20123
13 19933
14 20043
15 19943
16 20033
17 19983
18 20092
19 20072
20 20241

About Mark Vessey

Mark Vessey is a scholar working on History, Philosophy, Classics, Archeology and Anthropology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Augustinian Studies and Theology (14 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (11 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (10 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (8 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (8 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (7 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (174 citations), Anthropology (121 citations), History (117 citations), Philosophy (96 citations) and Religious studies (39 citations). Mark Vessey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include James W. Halporn and Karla Pollmann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of early Christian studies, Vigiliae Christianae, Augustinian Studies, Journal of Roman Archaeology and Church History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact