Mark Um

1.1k citations
10 papers · 884 · 1 hit paper · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Um

10 papers receiving 869 citations

Mark Um's Hit Papers

Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a trapped-ion system 2014 · 320 citations
3200+4+8Years since publication100200300

Peers

Mark Um
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 269
  • Artificial Intelligence 456
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 406
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 1
  • Algebra and Number Theory 2
Replace T. H. Johnson with:
T. H. Johnson United Kingdom
Christopher Eltschka Germany
Ji Chu China
Jun Jing China
Benedetto Militello Italy
Sergey N. Filippov Russia
Göktuğ Karpat Türkiye
F. L. Semião Brazil
Mohammad Mehboudi Spain
B. Mojaveri Iran
Mark Um relative to T. H. Johnson United Kingdom T. H. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
T. H. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Um

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Um's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Um with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Um more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Um

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Um. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Um. The network helps show where Mark Um may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Um, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Um Line = papers co-authored together Mark Um links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1
Experimental test of the quantum Jarzynski equality with a trapped-ion system
Hit paper breakdown →
2014320
2 2017224
3 201874
4 201372
5 201662
6 201349
7 201730
8 201528
9 202223
10 20192

About Mark Um

Mark Um is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 10 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (6 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (1 paper), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (1 paper), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (1 paper) and Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (269 citations), Artificial Intelligence (456 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (406 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (1 citation) and Algebra and Number Theory (2 citations). Mark Um has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kihwan Kim, Jing-Ning Zhang, Shuoming An, Dingshun Lv, Yao Lu, Ye Wang, H. T. Quan, Junhua Zhang, Zhang‐qi Yin and Luming Duan. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Photonics, Nature Communications, Journal of the Optical Society of America B and Science Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact