Mark Teeuwen

411 citations
48 papers · 124 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Japanese History and Culture
    • Asian Culture and Media Studies
    • Anthropological Studies and Insights
    • Philippine History and Culture

Papers in

Mark Teeuwen

32 papers receiving 79 citations

Peers

Mark Teeuwen
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Cultural Studies 75
  • Anthropology 23
  • Geography, Planning and Development 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 80
  • Philosophy 11
Replace W. G. Aston with:
W. G. Aston
Nathalie Clayer France
Peter Nosco Portugal
Cannon Schmitt Canada
Alphonse Dupront France
Luís Nicolau Parés Brazil
Virginia Mason Vaughan United States
Erik R. Seeman United States
Hugh R. Clark United States
Kate Wildman Nakai
Mark Teeuwen relative to W. G. Aston W. G. Aston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
W. G. Aston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Teeuwen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Teeuwen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Teeuwen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Teeuwen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Teeuwen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Teeuwen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Teeuwen. The network helps show where Mark Teeuwen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Mark Teeuwen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Teeuwen Line = papers co-authored together Mark Teeuwen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201015
2
A Social History of the Ise Shrines: Divine Capital
20178
3 20018
4 20177
5
Challenging paradigms: Buddhism and nativism : framing identity discourse in Buddhist environments
20134
6
Nakatomi Harae Kunge : purification and enlightenment in late-Heian Japan
19984
7 20134
8 20024
9
Shinto, a short history
20034
10 20234
11 20024
12 20144
13 19994
14 20233
15 20193
16
Glossing in Close Co-operation: Examples from Ninth-Century Martianus Capella Manuscripts
20093
17 20003
18 20013
19 20072
20 20132

About Mark Teeuwen

Mark Teeuwen is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Classics, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 48 papers that have together received 124 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (36 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (15 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Financial Crisis of the 21st Century (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (75 citations), Anthropology (23 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (13 citations), Sociology and Political Science (80 citations) and Philosophy (11 citations). Mark Teeuwen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Austria and China. Frequent co-authors include John M. Breen, J E Breen, Allan G. Grapard, Rolf H. Bremmer, Michel Mohr and Satoshi Itō. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Religion, Japan Forum, Religions and Contemporary Japan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact