Mark T. Carleton
Impact in
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Race, History, and American Society
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
- Legal Systems and Judicial Processes 3
-
- Race, History, and American Society 3
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 2
- Cuban History and Society 1
- Co-authors
- Blake McKelvey (1 shared paper)Gerald N. Grob (1 shared paper)Philip D. Jordan (1 shared paper)Dan T. Carter (1 shared paper)Laurence Shore (1 shared paper)Joe Gray Taylor (1 shared paper)William Ivy Hair (1 shared paper)Arthur S. Miller (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Southern History (4 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Journal of American History (1 paper)The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) (1 paper)American Journal of Legal History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark T. Carleton
10 papers receiving 190 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- General Psychology 5
- Sociology and Political Science 161
- Anthropology 26
- Linguistics and Language 12
- Clinical Psychology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Carleton
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Carleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Carleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Carleton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Carleton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Carleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Carleton. The network helps show where Mark T. Carleton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark T. Carleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1977 | 78 | |
| 2 | 1978 | 52 | |
| 3 | 1974 | 44 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 1 |
About Mark T. Carleton
Mark T. Carleton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), American Sports and Literature (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper), American History and Culture (1 paper) and Cuban History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (5 citations), Sociology and Political Science (161 citations), Anthropology (26 citations), Linguistics and Language (12 citations) and Clinical Psychology (56 citations). Mark T. Carleton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Blake McKelvey, Gerald N. Grob, Philip D. Jordan, Dan T. Carter, Laurence Shore, Joe Gray Taylor, William Ivy Hair and Arthur S. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) and American Journal of Legal History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.