Mark Stenger

3.4k citations
29 papers · 678 · h-index 14

Impact in

    • Reproductive tract infections research
    • Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
    • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Papers in

Mark Stenger

27 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

Mark Stenger
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Microbiology 290
  • Infectious Diseases 123
  • General Health Professions 141
  • Physiology 115
  • Epidemiology 110
Replace Cheryl Malinski with:
Cheryl Malinski United States
Fuchang Hong China
Xiangdong Gong China
Elizabeth Torrone United States
Bronwyn Silver Australia
Kathleen Stine United States
Valdir Monteiro Pinto Brazil
Ligang Yang China
Kate Maddaford Australia
Tina Hylton-Kong United States
Mark Stenger relative to Cheryl Malinski United States Cheryl Malinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Cheryl Malinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stenger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stenger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stenger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stenger. The network helps show where Mark Stenger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Stenger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Stenger Line = papers co-authored together Mark Stenger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2013
2014119
2 2015106
3 202169
4 201764
5 201739
6
Reported STDs in the United States : 2012 national data for chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis
201433
7 201228
8 201328
9 201822
10 201421
11 200920
12 201420
13 201617
14 200916
15 201713
16 201211
17 20149
18 20098
19 20158
20 20158

About Mark Stenger

Mark Stenger is a scholar working on Microbiology, Physiology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Infectious Diseases, having authored 29 papers that have together received 678 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive tract infections research (18 papers), Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (3 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (2 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (290 citations), Infectious Diseases (123 citations), General Health Professions (141 citations), Physiology (115 citations) and Epidemiology (110 citations). Mark Stenger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Kenya and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Hillard Weinstock, Roxanne P. Kerani, Matthew R. Golden, Elizabeth Torrone, Cheryl Malinski, James P. Hughes, King K. Holmes, Elizabeth Torrone, Eloisa Llata and Jami S. Leichliter. Their work appears in journals such as Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Public Health Reports, Sexual Health, AIDS and Behavior and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact