Mark Santer

828 citations
30 papers · 690 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Santer

30 papers receiving 682 citations

Peers

Mark Santer
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 78
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 201
  • Filtration and Separation 13
  • Condensed Matter Physics 56
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 33
Replace Andrzej J. Rzepiela with:
Andrzej J. Rzepiela Switzerland
Nikolai Smolin United States
Irina A. Shkel United States
Johannes Möller Germany
Daniel S. Banks Canada
Tanya M. Raschke United States
A. Gabriel France
Vincent B. Chu United States
David Zbaida Israel
J. Chakrabarti India
Mark Santer relative to Andrzej J. Rzepiela Switzerland Andrzej J. Rzepiela's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Andrzej J. Rzepiela · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Santer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Santer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Santer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Santer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Santer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Santer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Santer. The network helps show where Mark Santer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Santer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Santer Line = papers co-authored together Mark Santer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200173
2 201671
3 200868
4 200353
5 201841
6 201536
7 201236
8 201232
9 201231
10 200728
11 201423
12 201619
13 200819
14 200918
15 201617
16 201415
17 201613
18 200113
19 201613
20 201811

About Mark Santer

Mark Santer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ecology, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (78 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (201 citations), Filtration and Separation (13 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (56 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (33 citations). Mark Santer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Reinhard Lipowsky, Koji Ando, Michael Moseler, Uwe Manthe, Gerhard Stock, Roland Zengerle, Peter H. Seeberger, Daniel Varón Silva, Svetlana Santer and Ivan Vilotijević. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Langmuir, The Journal of Chemical Physics, New Journal of Physics and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact