Mark R. Wick
Impact in
- Dermatology top 5%
- Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Papers in
-
- Cancer and Skin Lesions 5
-
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment 3
- Co-authors
- Paul E. Swanson (5 shared papers)Louis P. Dehner (3 shared papers)Evan George (1 shared paper)Stacey E. Mills (1 shared paper)Chaim M. Bell (1 shared paper)Gwen Mazoujian (1 shared paper)Philip H. Cooper (1 shared paper)Aizen J. Marrogi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Cutaneous Pathology (2 papers)American Journal of Dermatopathology (1 paper)The American Journal of Surgical Pathology (1 paper)Current Opinion in Oncology (1 paper)Diagnostic Cytopathology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark R. Wick
9 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Dermatology 146
- Oral Surgery 85
- Rheumatology 119
- Oncology 116
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 135
Countries citing papers authored by Mark R. Wick
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark R. Wick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark R. Wick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark R. Wick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark R. Wick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark R. Wick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark R. Wick. The network helps show where Mark R. Wick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Mark R. Wick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chordoma in childhood and adolescence. A clinicopathologic analysis of 12 cases. | 1993 | 94 |
| 2 | 1991 | 62 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 42 | |
| 5 | An immunohistochemical comparison of chordoma with renal cell carcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, and myxopapillary ependymoma: a potential diagnostic dilemma in the diminutive biopsy. | 1993 | 37 |
| 6 | Pulmonary artery trunk sarcoma: a clinicopathologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical study of four cases. | 1989 | 31 |
| 7 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 7 |
About Mark R. Wick
Mark R. Wick is a scholar working on Dermatology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer and Skin Lesions (5 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (1 paper) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (146 citations), Oral Surgery (85 citations), Rheumatology (119 citations), Oncology (116 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (135 citations). Mark R. Wick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul E. Swanson, Louis P. Dehner, Evan George, Stacey E. Mills, Chaim M. Bell, Gwen Mazoujian, Philip H. Cooper, Aizen J. Marrogi, Ronald C. McGlennen and J. Carlos Manivel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, American Journal of Dermatopathology, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Current Opinion in Oncology and Diagnostic Cytopathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.