Mark R. Stone

844 citations
20 papers · 649 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Mark R. Stone

19 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

Mark R. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 390
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 171
  • Rehabilitation 48
  • Cell Biology 65
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Hugo A. Kerhervé with:
Hugo A. Kerhervé France
Alex Klemp United States
Marcos David Silva‐Cavalcante Brazil
Francesco Figura Italy
Bertrand Baron France
Marios Hadjicharalambous Cyprus
Adam G. Storey New Zealand
Rafael de Almeida Azevedo Brazil
Antônio Carlos de Moraes Brazil
H.-V. Ulmer Germany
Mark R. Stone relative to Hugo A. Kerhervé France Hugo A. Kerhervé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Hugo A. Kerhervé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark R. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark R. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark R. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark R. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark R. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark R. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark R. Stone. The network helps show where Mark R. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark R. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark R. Stone Line = papers co-authored together Mark R. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2014152
2
Relationships of isometric mid-thigh pull variables to weightlifting performance.
2013143
3 201171
4 201161
5 200953
6 201152
7 201126
8 201717
9 201316
10 199514
11 201711
12 201910
13 20196
14 20175
15 20205
16 20222
17 19802
18
Physiological effects of swim team training.
19832
19 20151
20 20220

About Mark R. Stone

Mark R. Stone is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Complementary and alternative medicine, Surgery and Organic Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 649 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports Performance and Training (14 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (4 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (3 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (390 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (171 citations), Rehabilitation (48 citations), Cell Biology (65 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Mark R. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alan St Clair Gibson, Kevin Thomas, Kevin Thompson, Les Ansley, Mick Wilkinson, Glyn Howatson, Stuart Goodall, Kimitake Sato, W. Guy Hornsby and Satoshi Mizuguchi. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Applied Physiology, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Experimental Neurology, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact