Mark Osborne

27 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers

Mark Osborne
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Geology 110
  • Geophysics 192
  • Mechanics of Materials 327
  • Ceramics and Composites 65
  • Earth-Surface Processes 66
Replace R.W.T. Wilkins with:
R.W.T. Wilkins Australia
Charles W. Spencer United States
Thomas Rainer Austria
В. М. Чубаров Russia
Jim Puckette United States
John V. Ross Canada
Toshiaki Masuda Japan
John L. Haas United States
Shengyu Yang China
Mark Osborne relative to R.W.T. Wilkins Australia R.W.T. Wilkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
R.W.T. Wilkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Osborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Osborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Osborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Osborne. The network helps show where Mark Osborne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Mark Osborne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Osborne Line = papers co-authored together Mark Osborne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004189
2 200068
3 201166
4 199462
5 199342
6 200939
7 201037
8 201134
9 199628
10 200024
11 200419
12
Memoir 70, Chapter 2: Mechanisms that Generate Abnormal Pressures: an Overview
199815
13 199714
14 19939
15 20198
16
Mechanisms for Generating Overpressure in Sedimentary Basins: A Reevaluation: Discussion
19987
17 19976
18 20205
19
Learning by Means of Holograms
20205
20 20044

About Mark Osborne

Mark Osborne is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Mechanical Engineering, Geology, Ocean Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 27 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (15 papers), Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (8 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (4 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (3 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (3 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (3 papers) and Clay minerals and soil interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geology (110 citations), Geophysics (192 citations), Mechanics of Materials (327 citations), Ceramics and Composites (65 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (66 citations). Mark Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Lacks, R. Stuart Haszeldine, David Selby, Alexander J. Finlay, Anthony E. Fallick, Richard E. Swarbrick, Ian Knight, Kenneth G. MacLeod, Daniel Grunberger and Andrew C. Aplin. Their work appears in journals such as Geological Society London Special Publications, Marine and Petroleum Geology, Geology, Petroleum Geoscience and AAPG Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact